Cost accounting rules beside tax rules
Federal contracts follow FAR cost principles and sometimes Cost Accounting Standards, which classify costs differently from the tax code.
Industry tax guide
Tax and accounting that keeps contract costs auditable and credits defensible.

Government contractors work under cost rules, audits and contract types that shape their accounting as much as the tax code does. Direct labor, indirect pools and unallowable costs all need a clear trail.
That same discipline supports tax savings. Contracts that leave the contractor at risk can produce research credits, and energy-efficient designs for government buildings have supported the 179D deduction.
Compared with a general business
Federal contracts follow FAR cost principles and sometimes Cost Accounting Standards, which classify costs differently from the tax code.
Indirect cost rates are submitted and audited, and the records must reconcile to both the books and the tax return.
Research paid for under a contract can be excluded from the research credit unless the contractor bears the risk and keeps rights.
Service Contract Act and Davis-Bacon prevailing wage and fringe requirements affect payroll reporting and benefit plan design.
The rules in detail
Research performed under a government contract qualifies for the credit only if payment depends on success and the contractor keeps substantial rights to the results. Fixed-price contracts often pass; cost-plus contracts are usually funded research.
Designers of energy-efficient government buildings could receive the 179D deduction by allocation. It ends for buildings whose construction begins after June 30, 2026, but projects started by then can still be allocated when placed in service.
Costs that the Federal Acquisition Regulation makes unallowable under a contract, such as some entertainment or lobbying, follow their own tax rules. Many remain deductible for tax even though they cannot be billed to the government.
Planning moves
Fixed-price and internally funded projects are reviewed for the research credit.
Many costs that cannot be billed to the government remain deductible for tax.
Designers of buildings that began construction by June 30, 2026 can still receive allocations.
Smaller contractors can defer tax on receivables under the cash method.
Bona fide fringe benefit plans can satisfy prevailing wage requirements at a lower tax cost.
Employees on contracts in several states are withheld and reported correctly from the first paycheck.
Working with OICPA
We review each contract's payment terms and rights before counting its research.
R&D Tax CreditIndirect pools, timekeeping and job cost reports that support both DCAA-style reviews and the tax return.
Management Reporting & KPI DashboardsWithholding and payroll filings for employees working on contracts in several states.
Payroll ServicesA monthly close and contract-level reporting run by our team.
Outsourced AccountingBookkeeping and reporting
Align project accounting with contract requirements and involve a government-contract specialist where specific compliance standards apply.
Direct labor, indirect expenses, subcontractor costs, and contract modifications need an audit trail that a general expense list cannot provide.
Contract terms, project budgets, timekeeping records, cost allocation policies, and invoice schedules give the review a practical starting point. We identify missing information before recommending changes.
Usually not, because the government pays regardless of success, which makes the research funded. Fixed-price development work is more likely to qualify.
For government buildings whose construction began on or before June 30, 2026, yes. The allocation is claimed for the year the building is placed in service.
Often. Allowability under a contract and deductibility for tax are separate questions; we review each category.
Rules reflect federal tax law as of November 2026.